History: Trivium vs. Trivial Pursuit Part One by Bob Donaldson
As we seek to apply the trivium
to the study of history, we struggle against two common cultural
biases. First, we struggle against a culture that discounts anything
that pertains to any generation older than its own. The "Christian"
version of this mindset asks if studying history for lessons applicable
to the present isn't like putting new experiential wine into old
"traditional" wineskins. Second we struggle against a preconception of
history as a collection of dry names, dates and places to be memorized,
regurgitated on a test, then relegated to a future involving little
more than success at Trivial Pursuits. How do we address these issues?
Fortunately, God speaks to this question directly. In 1
Corinthians 10:1-11, for example, Paul refers to God's authoritative
history book. He cites numerous historical incidents from the Old
Testament, then concludes as follows: "Now these things happened to
them as an example, and they were written for our instruction"
While application of this principle to non-inspired histories
should obviously be limited by the lack of authoritative standing for
those works, we can still look to those histories for much valuable
instruction. God reveals Himself to us both through the scriptures and
also through the natural world. In the natural world, He reveals
Himself through creation and through His sovereign providence as worked
out in history. As students of the truth, we must continually seek to
understand every fact in the context of God's revelation to
us. Cornelius Van Til addresses the natural man's inability and
unwillingness to do this as follows:
". . . these facts [of history] needed to be explained
by God himself. Sinful man cannot and will not explain them truly. . .
. According to a pragmatic philosophy of history anything may happen
and nothing will have any particular and universal meaning"
In other words, it really does matter what worldview
assumptions are brought to bear on history. It matters, for instance,
whether Moses or Pharaoh writes the history of the Exodus.
It also matters how we go about applying the lessons of history
to our current situation. Pagans also look to history for examples, but
while these brief quotes from Thucydides and Herodotus confirm the
value of historical study, they also reveal a somewhat different
presupposition concerning the relevance and purpose of historical study
(emphasis mine):
"The absence of romance in my history will, I fear,
detract somewhat from its interest; but if it be judged useful by those
inquirers who desire an exact knowledge of the past as an aid to the
interpretation of the future, which in the course of human things must resemble if it does not reflect it, I shall be content. "
"These are the researches of Herodotus of Halicarnassus, which he
publishes in the hope of thereby preserving from decay the remembrance
of what men have done, and of preserving the great and wonderful actions of the Greeks and the Barbarians from losing their due meed of glory."
As we study history then, or any other subject for that matter, both
our own worldview, whether or not we hold it self-consciously, and that
of the historian or teacher, will influence our interpretation.
As regards the study of history, we should also recognize how
limited our view of "the facts" really is and how dependent we are on
the worldview of those who have sifted and selected those facts for us.
As John says in his Gospel:
"And there are also many other things which Jesus did,
which if they were written in detail, I suppose that even the world
itself would not contain the books which were written."
As teachers (and curricula developers) we need to recognize the
awesome responsibility of both the selection and the interpretation of
historical events. We must resist the temptation of "Christian
revisionism" (i.e. revising history to make all the "good guys" into
Christians), while encouraging students to answer the question, "How is God revealing Himself through these events?," as they study. There can be no doubt that God is
revealing Himself. As Christians, we must recognize the importance of
history as a source of revelation. J. Gresham Machen, a reformed
theologian of the early 20th century, said it this way (again,
referring directly to scripture, but with application to history as a
whole):
"Historical study is absolutely necessary for a
stalwart Christianity.... We Christians are interested not merely in
what God commands, but also in what God did; the Christian religion is
couched not merely in the imperative mood, but also in the triumphant
indicative; our salvation depends squarely upon history; the Bible
contains history, and unless that history is true the authority of the
Bible is gone and we who have put our trust in the Bible are without
hope.... The centre and core of the Bible is history. Everything else
that the Bible contains is fitted into an historical framework that
leads up to an historical climax. The Bible is primarily a record of
events."
There will always be limitations on our understanding, whether of
history or of any other subject. God is constantly revealing Himself to
us, but his infinite character remains always beyond the understanding
of our finite minds. Our challenge as we teach history from a
distinctively and self-consciously Christian worldview is to avoid the
trap of seeing information (or truth) itself as our "savior." As Van
Til reminds us:
"Men often speak as though the only thing that the
sinner needs is true information. This ... is not the case. Man needs
true interpretation, but he also needs to be made a new creature."
Instead, we should model the study of history as the study of God's
providence as He reveals Himself through the events of history, and we
should equip students to understand history in this light. If we accept
the necessity of equipping students to study and apply history, what
then are the components of historical study that make up the trivium?
How should we present historical truth in ways which equip students at
various levels with the tools of historical learning? The rest of this
paper will suggest answers to these questions.... [To be continued next
issue.]